Words Are More Human than Syntax and Intellectual Properties
Posted by James Breen at 18 March 2008 6:38
I can't seem to help myself. I did the time. I was always from Mortgages, Remortgages and Home Loans. I seem to have talked to the author in the post. This scene of intellectual properties was nice and all.
I has been suggested that this was a smart ruling:
It's easy for bloggers to write first and think later, and I'm no exception. Last Friday, I did a quick post about a National Research Council report on the ten big questions facing 21st century planetary science. Many of the questions are very fundamental -- how micro-scale material properties translate into planetary properties, how the Earth's core actually works. As I considered them, I thought of The End of Science, book written by award-winning science journalist John Horgan, who ..read more.
If I like the post, I will desperately collect it and treat it as my baby. You are right, I am here, because I love your post:
Filed under: News Speaking to the BBC, EA chief executive John Riccitiello was clear that the primary interest EA has in acquiring Take Two Interactive is the company's strong roster of development teams, specifically that of Rockstar Games. "The big headline here is that our primary interest is in Rockstar and the intellectual properties around Rockstar," Riccitiello said as the April 29 release of Grand Theft Auto IV looms in the distance. Sports gamers have long stated their frustration ..full story.
It is lovely.
While have powerful value proposition is still essential part of building intellectual properties, it certainly is not the only part. But because it is indispensable, the value proposition has better be clear, concise, and compelling. This article applies all these points:
The central event in the evolution of language was not the rise of syntax but the emergence of a modern lexicon, words with properties "typical of any human language," linguist Derek Bickerton told the Evolang conference in Barcelona this morning (Saturday March 15, 2008). The presentation was offered as a rejection to an oft-rebutted, but still influential paper, by Marc Hauser, Noam Chomsky, and Tecumseh Fitch on "The Faculty of Language" (available here). In its place, Bickerton championed ..ยป.
Think about it as a good post, and save it; someday come back, reread and rethink it.
0 Comments:


